From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Do cpu-endian MMIO accessors exist?
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:44:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907221544.41054.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090722094309.10b25290@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > in this case. Also, ioread32 should actually multiplex between
> > readl() and inl() based on the address token, as the code in
> > lib/iomap.c does. It's probably easy enough to enable
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP on sh, and remove the ioread*/iowrite*
> > macros from arch/sh/include/asm/io.h.
>
> If your platform is purely MMIO based then ioread32 and readl can become
> the same thing, which is much more efficient. Even if you have port based
> devices that are mapped as MMIO surely its more efficient to do the
> relevant address tweaking in the iomap not in the read ?
I did check that the architecture in question (sh) cannot do this,
because it actually implements board specific PIO functions in
arch/sh/boards/mach-*/io.c.
For architectures that don't need such hacks, I fully agree.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-22 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 20:42 Do cpu-endian MMIO accessors exist? Pekka Paalanen
2009-07-21 20:59 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-07-21 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-21 21:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-21 22:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-22 17:11 ` Pekka Paalanen
2009-07-22 21:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-23 16:23 ` Pekka Paalanen
2009-07-22 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-21 21:56 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-07-21 22:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-22 7:24 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-07-22 8:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-22 8:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-22 13:44 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-07-27 5:00 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907221544.41054.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pq@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox