public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC -tip 2/4] Renamings to increase RCU clarity
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:22:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090724152232.GB2419@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090724002008.GB18282@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> Make RCU-sched, RCU-bh, and RCU-preempt be underlying implementations,
> with "RCU" defined in terms of one of the three.  Update the outdated
> rcu_qsctr_inc() names, as these functions no longer increment anything.

Sounds good, as long as RCU-sched can still be accessed directly for
tracing purpose (which seems to be the case here).

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---

[...]

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-24 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-24  0:14 [PATCH RFC -tip 0/4] RCU cleanups and simplified preemptable RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-24  0:16 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 1/4] Move private definitions from include/linux/rcutree.h to kernel/rcutree.h Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-24  0:20 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 2/4] Renamings to increase RCU clarity Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-24 15:22   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-07-24  0:21 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 3/4] Consolidate sparse and lockdep declarations in include/linux/rcupdate.h Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-24  0:27 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 4/4] Merge preemptable-RCU functionality into hierarchical RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-24 16:16   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-24 18:35     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090724152232.GB2419@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox