From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:39:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907252139.30674.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090725191037.GE14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com>
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:18:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 July 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > > > Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> > > > + .resume = au1xmmc_resume,
> > > > + .suspend = au1xmmc_suspend,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Was suspend to disk tested? It requires freeze()/thaw().
> >
> > Is that a regression introduced by this patch then? If so, many more of
> > the recent dev_pm_ops conversion patches would need to be revisited.
>
> Yes, as far as I understand they would. Let's ask Rafael to confirm...
Yes, they would. In general, you'd probably want to do something like this:
static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
.resume = au1xmmc_resume,
.suspend = au1xmmc_suspend,
.freeze = au1xmmc_resume,
.thaw = au1xmmc_suspend,
.restore = au1xmmc_resume,
.poweroff = au1xmmc_suspend,
};
but in this particular case it's probably better to define separate callbacks
for .freeze() and .thaw() at least.
During hibernation we call .freeze() and .thaw() before and after creating
the image, respectively, and then .poweroff() is called right after the image
has been saved. During resume .freeze() is called after the image has been
loaded and before the control goes to the image kernel, which then calls
.restore().
HTH
I see I forgot about that myself. I'll fix up the floppy and hp-wmi patches.
Best,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-25 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-22 15:18 [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion Manuel Lauss
2009-07-25 17:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-07-25 18:15 ` Manuel Lauss
2009-07-25 18:18 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-25 19:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-07-25 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-07-25 20:21 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-25 20:38 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-25 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-25 21:30 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-25 21:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-07-26 15:08 ` Mark Brown
2009-07-26 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-03 16:33 Albin Tonnerre
2009-08-03 19:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907252139.30674.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=manuel.lauss@gmail.com \
--cc=manuel.lauss@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox