* [PATCH] ncpfs: fix wrong check in __ncp_ioctl()
@ 2009-07-28 15:05 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2009-07-28 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Vandrovec
Cc: Julia Lawall, linux-kernel, Dan Carpenter, corbet, eteo, linware
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ncpfs: fix wrong check in __ncp_ioctl()
We want to check for s_inode's existence, not inode's one
(inode is always valid in this function).
This takes care of the following entry from Dan's list:
fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c +445 __ncp_ioctl(180) warning: variable derefenced before check 'inode'
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net
Cc: eteo@redhat.com
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: b/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static int __ncp_ioctl(struct inode *ino
if (dentry) {
struct inode* s_inode = dentry->d_inode;
- if (inode) {
+ if (s_inode) {
NCP_FINFO(s_inode)->volNumber = vnum;
NCP_FINFO(s_inode)->dirEntNum = de;
NCP_FINFO(s_inode)->DosDirNum = dosde;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-07-28 15:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-28 15:05 [PATCH] ncpfs: fix wrong check in __ncp_ioctl() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox