From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754781AbZG1VNW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:13:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754098AbZG1VNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:13:21 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34160 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754033AbZG1VNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:13:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:12:16 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Jakob Gruber Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Missing device IDs in rt2870 Message-ID: <20090728211216.GA12363@suse.de> References: <20090728230117.8fca2314.jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090728230117.8fca2314.jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:01:17PM +0200, Jakob Gruber wrote: > >From http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13459#c3 > > In rt2870.h, there are 2 lists of USB devices. One is within > > #ifndef RT30xx > #endif > > and the other in > > #ifdef RT30xx > #endif That kind of implies that the 2870 driver should not support this device, right? > > Since I'm not sure whether to add the devices to both lists or only the first, > I'm posting a patch for both variations. > > Patch 1, add devices only to first list: Well, pick one :) I'd prefer someone with one of these devices to test the patch and verify that it works before blindly applying. Fair enough? thanks, greg k-h