Re: [PATCH] kvm: remove superfluous NULL pointer check in kvm_inject_pit_timer_irqs()

[Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>]

On Wednesday 29 July 2009 06:46:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] kvm: remove superfluous NULL pointer check in
> kvm_inject_pit_timer_irqs()
>
> This takes care of the following entries from Dan's list:
>
> arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c +714 kvm_inject_pit_timer_irqs(6) warning: variable
> derefenced in initializer 'vcpu' arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c +714
> kvm_inject_pit_timer_irqs(6) warning: variable derefenced before check
> 'vcpu'
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Cc: corbet@lwn.net
> Cc: eteo@redhat.com
> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
> @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ void kvm_inject_pit_timer_irqs(struct kv
>  	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>  	struct kvm_kpit_state *ps;
>
> -	if (vcpu && pit) {
> +	if (pit) {
>  		int inject = 0;
>  		ps = &pit->pit_state;
>
Oh, follow up for the recent zero day exploit, right? :)

Yes, vcpu NULL check is not necessary here.

Acked-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html