From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753871AbZG2VMo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:12:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753252AbZG2VMn (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:12:43 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56396 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752706AbZG2VMn (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:12:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:11:40 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: consistent use of __u8 in scsi/scsi.h Message-ID: <20090729211140.GB3592@redhat.com> References: <20090729111114.GA15239@redhat.com> <1248875763.3900.1.camel@mulgrave.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1248875763.3900.1.camel@mulgrave.site> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:56:03AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > 3. Take over include/scsi export from glibc: this will necessitate > comparing our current headers and those of glibc and moving > stuff around. Speaking of which: is there a chance some userspace still depends on SCSI_IOCTL_TAGGED_{ENABLE,DISABLE} being defined (even though they don't work) ? glibc headers have them ...