From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754044AbZG2VqV (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:46:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753178AbZG2VqV (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:46:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:60183 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753154AbZG2VqU (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:46:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:42:18 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Lai Jiangshan , Rusty Russell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan , Miao Xie , Paul Menage , Peter Zijlstra , Gautham R Shenoy Subject: [PATCH 0/1] cpu_hotplug: don't play with current->cpus_allowed Message-ID: <20090729214218.GA24631@redhat.com> References: <20090729023302.GA8899@redhat.com> <20090729212125.GA16970@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090729212125.GA16970@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am suggesting this patch instead of cpu_hotplug-dont-affect-current-tasks-affinity.patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=124830024011314 in -mm tree. Of course this is subjective, but it really looks simpler to me. Not a big deal though, I am sending it mostly because nobody replied to my question, and I had to actually compile and test this patch ;) Thoughts? Oleg.