From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Roger Quadros <quadros.roger@gmail.com>
Cc: lrg@slimlogic.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regulator: adding enable control to fixed regulator interface
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:36:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090730123633.GA2739@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b90c0690907300520t1dfbd722j73417b1beb6992bc@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:20:24PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
[Cut description of GPIO-switched regulator.]
> What is the best way to implement this within the regulator framework?
> Writing a regulator driver is one solution but I'm sure there must be
> many instances like this and writing a driver for each case is not
> that nice.
Only one driver should be needed even if a new driver is implemented for
this - we already have an abstracted API for GPIOs in the form of
gpiolib (see drivers/gpio) so the driver can just take in platform data
with the gpio number and a voltage as platform data.
> I want to use the fixed regulator driver but this does not have
> regulator enable/disable control.
> Isn't it a good idea to have enable/disable control for the current
> implementation of the fixed voltage regulator i.e. drivers/regulator/fixed.c ?
It should be possible to do it with platform data for the fixed voltage
regulator, though without looking at the code I can't say for certain if
it'd be easier to just add a separate driver rather than have the
conditional code to handle cases both with and without GPIO. I'd expect
it'll be fine to combine, though.
> The regulator enabling/disabling functionality can be implemented by
> platform code and the required function pointers could be passed through
> fixed_voltage_config structure.
I don't see any need for platform code to provide callbacks here given
the existing gpiolib abstraction.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-30 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-30 12:20 regulator: adding enable control to fixed regulator interface Roger Quadros
2009-07-30 12:36 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2009-07-30 12:52 ` Roger Quadros
2009-07-30 12:55 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090730123633.GA2739@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=quadros.roger@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox