From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 10/12] move NTP adjusted clock multiplier to struct timekeeper
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090731095254.3ed0cb7d@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248991488.3374.14.camel@localhost>
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:04:48 -0700
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:41 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (timekeeper-mult.diff)
> > From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >
> > The clocksource structure has two multipliers, the unmodified multiplier
> > clock->mult_orig and the NTP corrected multiplier clock->mult. The NTP
> > multiplier is misplaced in the struct clocksource, this is private
> > information of the timekeeping code. Add the mult field to the struct
> > timekeeper to contain the NTP corrected value, keep the unmodifed
> > multiplier in clock->mult and remove clock->mult_orig. For consistency
> > add the shift value associated with the NTP corrected mult value to
> > struct timekeeper as well.
> >
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/clocksource.h | 4 +---
> > kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > @@ -149,8 +149,7 @@ extern u64 timecounter_cyc2time(struct t
> > * @disable: optional function to disable the clocksource
> > * @mask: bitmask for two's complement
> > * subtraction of non 64 bit counters
> > - * @mult: cycle to nanosecond multiplier (adjusted by NTP)
> > - * @mult_orig: cycle to nanosecond multiplier (unadjusted by NTP)
> > + * @mult: cycle to nanosecond multiplier
> > * @shift: cycle to nanosecond divisor (power of two)
> > * @flags: flags describing special properties
> > * @vread: vsyscall based read
> > @@ -168,7 +167,6 @@ struct clocksource {
> > void (*disable)(struct clocksource *cs);
> > cycle_t mask;
> > u32 mult;
> > - u32 mult_orig;
> > u32 shift;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > cycle_t (*vread)(void);
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct timekeeper {
> > s64 ntp_error;
> > int xtime_shift;
> > int ntp_error_shift;
> > + u32 mult; /* NTP adjusted clock multiplier */
> > + u32 shift; /* NTP adjusted clock shift */
>
> I'm a little confused here. NTP doesn't adjust the shift value. This
> seems redundant with the xtime_shift value introduced in [patch 9/12].
True the NTP code does not adjust the shift value. But mult and shift
build a pair, no? I think it is more readable if we use timekeeper.mult
and timekeeper.shift instead of timekeeper.mult and clock->shift.
And the xtime_shift does not need to be the same value as the clock
shift - at least in theory. It is just a shift to increase precision.
Therefore I would like to use the xtime_shift and ntp_error_shift values
exclusively as the shifts for the respective xtime_nsec and ntp_error
values. Makes sense ?
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-31 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 13:41 [RFC][patch 00/12] clocksource / timekeeping rework V2 Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 01/12] introduce timekeeping_leap_insert Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 21:02 ` john stultz
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 02/12] remove clocksource inline functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 14:15 ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-30 21:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-30 21:05 ` john stultz
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 03/12] cleanup clocksource selection Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 04/12] clocksource watchdog highres enablement Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 05/12] clocksource watchdog resume logic Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 06/12] clocksource watchdog refactoring Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 07/12] clocksource watchdog work Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 08/12] introduce struct timekeeper Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 09/12] add xtime_shift and ntp_error_shift to " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 22:15 ` john stultz
2009-07-31 8:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 10/12] move NTP adjusted clock multiplier " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 22:04 ` john stultz
2009-07-31 7:52 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-07-31 8:12 ` john stultz
2009-07-31 8:27 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-31 9:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-31 23:32 ` john stultz
2009-08-03 8:02 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-08-13 11:15 ` Linus Walleij
2009-08-13 11:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 11/12] timekeeper read clock helper functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 21:39 ` john stultz
2009-07-31 7:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-31 8:11 ` john stultz
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 12/12] update clocksource with stop_machine Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 15:10 ` [RFC][patch 00/12] clocksource / timekeeping rework V2 Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090731095254.3ed0cb7d@skybase \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox