From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1752363AbZHAILx@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752363AbZHAILx (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:11:53 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751935AbZHAILv
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:11:51 -0400
Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:60001 "EHLO
	one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751795AbZHAILp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:11:45 -0400
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:11:41 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>,
       Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>,
       Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>,
       Reiserfs <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
       Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gmail.com>,
       "Trenton D. Adams" <trenton.d.adams@gmail.com>,
       Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
       Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@texware.it>,
       Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       Marcel Hilzinger <mhilzinger@linuxnewmedia.de>,
       Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Reiserfs/kill-bkl tree v2
Message-ID: <20090801081141.GA18036@basil.fritz.box>
References: <20090731174642.GA6539@nowhere>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090731174642.GA6539@nowhere>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 07:46:43PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> IV) Testing and review

You seem to have done a lot of benchmarks, but did you also do stress testing?

While a performance issue wouldn't be good, corrupting someone's file system
would be really bad.

e.g. running all the file system stress tests from LTP would be a good 
idea, ideally multiple at a time on a multi processor system on a ram
disk or perhaps AIM9.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.