From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net>
Cc: debian developer <debiandev@gmail.com>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
tux3@tux3.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: [Tux3] Current Activities?
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:26:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090801222637.GA8680@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908010942.52623.phillips@phunq.net>
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 09:42:51AM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Shapor maintains our website, which does have a wiki. Just ping him on
> irc about it.
Free hint: make a pointer to the wiki be much more prominent on the
tux3.org web site. I tried looking for it on the tux3 web site, and
then on google, and the closest thing I could find was this empty wiki:
http://bitbucket.org/shapor/tux3/wiki/Home
One thing which you might want to include is what makes the tux3 file
system unique and why someone might want to use tux3 instead of some
other file system? The web site talks about "versioned pointer" which
is a technical feature that might appeal to a computer scientist ---
but what does that mean to an end user?
Performance? Features? If so, which features? From what I can tell,
the feature set of tux3 seems to be a subset of btrfs; is there some
feature or features that tux3 have that other filesystems will not?
Not that I advocate file system developers throwing elbows or
otherwise being too competitive with each other, but the reality is
that every file system design makes tradeoffs, giving it certain
strengths, and some weaknesses. So what *is* tux3's core design
focus, in terms of workload, or user base? Making a clear statement
about what the goals of the tux3 filesystem on the web site is
certainly one of those things that I would recommend.
Best regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-01 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6dcc37b30904291901m7abdd6d7q6f44b2c248ec48c4@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <200904302049.27235.phillips@phunq.net>
2009-07-31 9:10 ` [Tux3] Current Activities? debian developer
2009-08-01 16:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2009-08-01 22:26 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-08-06 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-08 23:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2009-08-10 12:26 ` debian developer
2009-08-10 13:29 ` Theodore Tso
2009-08-10 14:19 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-10 17:34 ` david
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090801222637.GA8680@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=debiandev@gmail.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@phunq.net \
--cc=tux3@tux3.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox