From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754651AbZHCX41 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:56:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754223AbZHCX40 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:56:26 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53384 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753976AbZHCX4Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:56:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:53:06 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Roland McGrath Cc: Andrew Morton , utrace-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] introduce tracehook_finish_jctl() helper Message-ID: <20090803235306.GA6821@redhat.com> References: <20090729020139.GA7381@redhat.com> <20090729155007.f4f5a793.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090801233207.E1FEB4C7FF@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090801233207.E1FEB4C7FF@magilla.sf.frob.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/01, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Confused. This patch has no effect. > > Indeed, the three patches changing do_signal_stop() have no immediate > material effect. They all just clean up the code and prepare the hooks > that utrace (or something like it) needs to make tracing stops mesh well > with job control stops. I'd thought it might be simpler for review to just > roll these three together and send you a single patch to replace > signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch; but Oleg decided to keep it > sliced smaller. But let me repeat, I would be happy if these 2 new patches are folded into signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch. Oleg.