From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932617AbZHDOc2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:32:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932363AbZHDOc1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:32:27 -0400 Received: from outbound-dub.frontbridge.com ([213.199.154.16]:57404 "EHLO IE1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932355AbZHDOc0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:32:26 -0400 X-SpamScore: -17 X-BigFish: VPS-17(zz1454K1432R98dN10d1Izz1202hzzz32i203h6bh43j61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-WSS-ID: 0KNUWCX-03-KYV-01 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:31:50 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ingo Molnar CC: Andreas Herrmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Sachin Sant , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Boot failure on x86_64 (OOPS set_cpu_sibling_map() ) Message-ID: <20090804143150.GC1870@aftab> References: <20090730182143.eadf36e6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A718338.6050907@in.ibm.com> <20090730135623.GB16659@aftab> <20090803093144.GC9074@elte.hu> <20090803101401.GA14442@aftab> <20090803120739.GA29156@elte.hu> <20090803125059.GB14442@aftab> <20090804135029.GA6775@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090804135029.GA6775@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2009 14:31:47.0090 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BEC0720:01CA1510] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:50:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Mind preparing a separate branch for it (.31-rc5 based) and send me > > > a pull request so that we can share the commit between the EDAC tree > > > and the x86 tree? > > > > Well, Andreas says the patches need a little polishing and he'll > > be sending updated versions soon so you can pick them up. And > > since the EDAC MCE stuff might still change before .32 merge > > window opens, let's synchronize our pull requests instead. In the > > meantime, I'll be rediffing the EDAC stuff against -tip for > > linux-next. > > Would you rebase just due to this commit? No, I wanted to keep the opportunity to be able to rebase the whole series until the very last minute before the merge window, should anything need to be changed... > No need for that, feel free to carry it until Andreas sends an updated > version. Then i can put it into a separate .31-rc5 based topic that > you can pull into the EDAC tree. ... and this is basically what I had in mind: After you pull them in, I'll rebase my branch against yours for linux-next. I see that Stephen pulls edac before -tip in linux-next so I'll ask him nicely to reorder those. This approach makes most sense anyways since edac relies on a bunch of x86 facilities (topology bits, rd/wrmsr_on_cpus, mcheck etc) and it is only natural that it goes second in linux-next, right? Then the pull requests will go out in the same order during the merge window and we should be fine. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München (OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632