From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933330AbZHDW2w (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:28:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754978AbZHDW2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:28:51 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40895 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751692AbZHDW2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:28:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:28:40 +0100 From: Russell King To: Pavel Machek Cc: kernel list Subject: Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval) Message-ID: <20090804222840.GC18365@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090804100051.GA17106@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090804100051.GA17106@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:00:51PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Please fix your mailinglist. > > You claimed that it is possible to crosspost between lkml and lakml, > yet the lakml does everything to prevent that -- even in case as > simple as reporting that regression that affects arm. Given your attitude, I'm going to say I'm NOT going to do a damned thing if you can't talk to me in a sane and civilised way. Treat me like shit and you will be treated as shit. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: