From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752130AbZHEPMT (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:12:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751144AbZHEPMT (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:12:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47092 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750878AbZHEPMS (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:12:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:11:39 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton , ieidus@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, chrisw@redhat.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/12] ksm: pages_unshared and pages_volatile Message-ID: <20090805151139.GY23385@random.random> References: <20090804144920.bfc6a44f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > procfs is not a nice interface for sysfs to be reading > when it's asked to show pages_volatile! Agreed, that is the real reason, grabbing that info from slub/slab/slob (not so much from procfs) would be tricky. Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli