From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752677AbZHFHPc (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 03:15:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752214AbZHFHPb (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 03:15:31 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:36912 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752494AbZHFHPa (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 03:15:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:15:27 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Amerigo Wang Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman , "Eric W. Biederman" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [Patch 1/7] x86: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Message-ID: <20090806071526.GA22124@basil.fritz.box> References: <20090805112123.6552.73574.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090805112133.6552.69619.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <87zlaeiakr.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4A7A3807.8090803@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A7A3807.8090803@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> More useful would seem a crashkernel=size@auto >> > We already have this, just use "crashkernel=size@0". :) When it's already there then I don't see the point of the feature at all. Hardcoding the size doesn't really make any sense to me, especially a suspicious one like 128MB. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.