public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:08:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090806160835.GD7198@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A7ACBAF.8040305@inria.fr>

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:25:19PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > Of course I thought also to implement it this way because it looks
> > more consistent, but IMHO the patches are less intrusive if this
> > scheme is _not_ used. Instead I kept core_siblings as is ("for
> > historic reasons", nobody needs to accustom to new semantics). And use
> > cpu_node_siblings where it really matters.
> >   
> 
> Well, core_siblings and cpu_node_sibling will only be different on
> Magny-Cours anyway. So even if core_siblings becomes "all cores in
> cpu_node" instead of "all cores in socket", it won't actually break any
> existing setup. I personally prefer having the same kind of semantics
> for all foo_siblings rather than having something with a different
> meaning between core and thread.

You just want to have the user interface adapted to your
semantics. I.e. you want to have following attributes:
(from Documentation/cputopology.txt)

 1) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id:
 represent the physical package id of  cpu X;
 2) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_id:
 represent the cpu core id to cpu X;
 3) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/cpu_node_id:
 represent the processor internal node_id to cpu X;
 4) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings:
 represent the thread siblings to cpu X in the same core;
 5) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings:
 represent the thread siblings to cpu X in the same processor internal node;
 6) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/cpu_node_siblings:
 represent the thread siblings to cpu X in the same physical package;

 Note: In case of multi-node processors (e.g. Magny-Cours) 5 and 6
 differ. For all other CPUs 5 and 6 provide similar values and
 cpu_node_id is 0.

Ok, I can modify the first two patches accordingly to swap the two
attributes and also provide an update for the documentation file.

(But I will keep the internal identifiers for the cpu_node stuff
as is.)


Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
  System  | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
 Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
  Center  | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
  (OSRC)  | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632



  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-06 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-05 15:44 [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] topology: Introduce cpu_node information for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Provide CPU topology " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06  8:30   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-06 16:15     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 17:44       ` [PATCH] x86, smpboot: use zalloc_cpumask_var instead of alloc/clear Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Add cpu_node topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86, cacheinfo: Fixup L3 cache information for AMD multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86, mcheck: Make use of cpu_node_mask instead of cpu_core_mask Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 20:23 ` [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 10:42   ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 12:25     ` Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 16:08       ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-08-06 17:29 ` [PATCH] x86, topology: Swap semantic of core_siblings and cpu_node_siblings Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 18:24   ` [PATCH] topology: Update CPU topology documentation Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-08 15:17 ` [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Ingo Molnar
2009-08-08 15:49   ` Brice Goglin
2009-08-21 10:34   ` Andreas Herrmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090806160835.GD7198@alberich.amd.com \
    --to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
    --cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox