From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: use zalloc_cpumask_var instead of alloc/clear
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:44:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090806174433.GG7198@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090806161552.GE7198@alberich.amd.com>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:15:52PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:30:46PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:48:11 +0200 Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -1061,8 +1070,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> > > for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> > > alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i));
> > > + cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i));
> >
> > I noticed this in linux-next ... you can use zalloc_cpumask_var() instead
> > of alloc_cpumask_var() followed by cpumask_clear().
>
> I know, there is a collision with a patch in linux-next that replaced
> alloc_cpumask_var/cpumask_clear with the zalloc version.
>
> (a) Either that patch should be adapted to change also the new allocation.
> (b) I can also change all those allocation to zalloc with my patch.
>
> Make your choice:
>
> [ ] (a)
> [ ] (b)
My choice is
[X] (c) Do this in a separate patch.
See below.
Regards,
Andreas
--
>From 5d7e6138d4bc2d8c5191e6bf9cfbe9d5a27d79b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:31:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: use zalloc_cpumask_var instead of alloc/clear
Suggested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 12 ++++--------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index f50af56..f797214 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1068,14 +1068,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
#endif
current_thread_info()->cpu = 0; /* needed? */
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
- alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
- alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
- alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
- cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i));
- cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i));
- cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i));
- cpumask_clear(cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
}
set_cpu_sibling_map(0);
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-05 15:44 [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] topology: Introduce cpu_node information for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Provide CPU topology " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 8:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-06 16:15 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 17:44 ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-08-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Add cpu_node topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86, cacheinfo: Fixup L3 cache information for AMD multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86, mcheck: Make use of cpu_node_mask instead of cpu_core_mask Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 20:23 ` [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 10:42 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 12:25 ` Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 16:08 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 17:29 ` [PATCH] x86, topology: Swap semantic of core_siblings and cpu_node_siblings Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 18:24 ` [PATCH] topology: Update CPU topology documentation Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-08 15:17 ` [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Ingo Molnar
2009-08-08 15:49 ` Brice Goglin
2009-08-21 10:34 ` Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090806174433.GG7198@alberich.amd.com \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox