public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: use zalloc_cpumask_var instead of alloc/clear
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:44:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090806174433.GG7198@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090806161552.GE7198@alberich.amd.com>

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:15:52PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:30:46PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrea,
> > 
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:48:11 +0200 Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -1061,8 +1070,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> > >  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> > >  		alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >  		alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +		alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >  		alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >  		cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i));
> > > +		cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i));
> > 
> > I noticed this in linux-next ... you can use zalloc_cpumask_var() instead
> > of alloc_cpumask_var() followed by cpumask_clear().
> 
> I know, there is a collision with a patch in linux-next that replaced
> alloc_cpumask_var/cpumask_clear with the zalloc version.
> 
> (a) Either that patch should be adapted to change also the new allocation.
> (b) I can also change all those allocation to zalloc with my patch.
> 
> Make your choice:
> 
> [ ] (a)
> [ ] (b)


My choice is
 [X] (c) Do this in a separate patch.

See below.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
>From 5d7e6138d4bc2d8c5191e6bf9cfbe9d5a27d79b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:31:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: use zalloc_cpumask_var instead of alloc/clear

Suggested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |   12 ++++--------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index f50af56..f797214 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1068,14 +1068,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 #endif
 	current_thread_info()->cpu = 0;  /* needed? */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
-		alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
-		alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
-		alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
-		alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
-		cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i));
-		cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i));
-		cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i));
-		cpumask_clear(cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map);
+		zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+		zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+		zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+		zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
 	}
 	set_cpu_sibling_map(0);
 
-- 
1.6.3.3




  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-06 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-05 15:44 [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] topology: Introduce cpu_node information for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Provide CPU topology " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06  8:30   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-06 16:15     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 17:44       ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-08-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Add cpu_node topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86, cacheinfo: Fixup L3 cache information for AMD multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 15:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86, mcheck: Make use of cpu_node_mask instead of cpu_core_mask Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-05 20:23 ` [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 10:42   ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 12:25     ` Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 16:08       ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 17:29 ` [PATCH] x86, topology: Swap semantic of core_siblings and cpu_node_siblings Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-06 18:24   ` [PATCH] topology: Update CPU topology documentation Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-08 15:17 ` [PATCH 0/5 v4] x86: Adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Ingo Molnar
2009-08-08 15:49   ` Brice Goglin
2009-08-21 10:34   ` Andreas Herrmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090806174433.GG7198@alberich.amd.com \
    --to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox