public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@pengutronix.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>,
	Luotao Fu <l.fu@pengutronix.de>,
	socketcan-users@lists.berlios.de,
	Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Socketcan-users] [PATCH] CAN: make checking in can_rcv less restrictive
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:02:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090806210230.GA22418@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090806201740.GA7067@pengutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1179 bytes --]

Hi Oliver (again ;-)),

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:17:40PM +0200, Luotao Fu wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:48:23PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > 
....
> > When this BUG() triggers, someone provided a definitely broken *CAN* network
> > driver, and this needsfp to be fixed on that level. 
> 
> In our case a sender (a FPGA) generates correct can frames carrying
> wrong dlc length. This way the can driver on our side runs into the bug
> though the driver itself is allright. The opposite needed to be fixed,
> not our side.  Though we do suffer a system crash only because the
> sender sends trash into the can network. This is imo quite bad.
> 

/me answering myself
had a closer look again. Seemed you are right. The can driver should
have get the can_dlc right prior to passing the message a level higher.

cheers
Fu
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Dipl.-Ing. Luotao Fu        |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-06 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-06 15:24 [PATCH] CAN: make checking in can_rcv less restrictive Luotao Fu
2009-08-06 16:48 ` [Socketcan-users] " Oliver Hartkopp
2009-08-06 20:17   ` Luotao Fu
2009-08-06 20:58     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-08-06 21:02     ` Luotao Fu [this message]
2009-08-07  4:08       ` Oliver Hartkopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090806210230.GA22418@pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.fu@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=oliver@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=socketcan-users@lists.berlios.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox