From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753255AbZHGR2O (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:28:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753608AbZHGR2N (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:28:13 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:65346 "EHLO mail-bw0-f215.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570AbZHGR2N (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:28:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ezrmkjOH6nSvZP/1FwhuKFGSF2+y123oLsrebGxN07jNWN5ZvTiYnYsFZQ8+w75w5Q nKAkGQQcixK3FQmz2BRjIDU0d2DQnEjwgIcP5t2QIvddDw+dFcCqnQrQ5re13x5zWKd0 hwwnFcV6lfeQgQ/hbrLW8N0NWoXkspK029QIs= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:27:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.31-rc5-00246-g90bc1a6; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200907011835.27586.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200908071355.21648.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090807.090158.45976865.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20090807.090158.45976865.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908071927.36367.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 August 2009 18:01:58 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:55:21 +0200 > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 22:47:29 David Miller wrote: > >> Will get to it before the end of the weekend. > >> > >> If I fail or abort, I'll integrate your version of the fix Bart, don't > >> worry :) > > > > Not that I'm worried but just out of curiosity.. > > > > Could you please tell me which week/month/year are we talking about here? > > I became busier than I expected here in New York :-) I would say that this is a bit unprofessional attitude which normally is not accepted by PNAELV people.. :-) > Actually both patches #4 and #5 are in my ide-next-2.6 tree, I just > need to publish it out to kernel.org and update the patchwork status > on these patches. Are you trying to tell me that after 6 weeks there is still no public tree to hold future IDE changes? If this is indeed a case here I hope that it will get addressed ASAP.