From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754826AbZHGRq7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:46:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754690AbZHGRq6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:46:58 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:48860 "EHLO mail-bw0-f215.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754645AbZHGRq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:46:57 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1124 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:46:56 EDT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=pZbt8n21Z+DfzMilY9nzs2csX7rec0Gv8U+FL+/J1VZyGLvywiA/lrsCz7uPNmc7J2 xQwNSnGweKnVhcMUmPl2bF3eXNJm4PDb3mALeH+n8yMuOk+FzY8ofiQsjgLG8PhniEKu K0aUfzw0hhS8ofxyGDG+O5xVM0BHU2vcGP3T4= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:46:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.31-rc5-00246-g90bc1a6; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200908071355.21648.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200908071927.36367.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090807.103610.209136140.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20090807.103610.209136140.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908071946.07991.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 August 2009 19:36:10 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:27:36 +0200 > > > Are you trying to tell me that after 6 weeks there is still no public > > tree to hold future IDE changes? > > > > If this is indeed a case here I hope that it will get addressed ASAP. > > IDE is deep maintainence, we shouldn't be doing lots of changes, > cleanups, and things of this nature. So urgency and timeliness > is on a sincerely different scale for it. Nobody is saying anything about cleanups and things of this nature.. > On the other hand, if you've been looking, I've been applying > networking patches to net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 by the truckload > on a daily basis because it is in active development. Excellence in one area doesn't magically translate to other areas, especially when said area needs a completely different approach: I've been looking and I've seen you pushing non-trivial IDE bug-fix patches with almost no wider hardware coverage to upstream (i.e. one of my own patches which has been _explicitly_ marked as needing more linux-next exposure)..