From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933683AbZHGUVL (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:21:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933582AbZHGUVK (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:21:10 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:11253 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933608AbZHGUVJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:21:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Hi4vwCGAp492QFI+cADdeLFpT/byJRrwPQNHDwQUTPTGO/TTQBwpZJsuHMxf7RUhHn NNllMaIXpF+/xN6uzc9tiVwZsxjTKNoVIhcoF/MjzmNv3NVyTZ1LKQ6E50/bzR+/MUE0 0yGysA+kAYzqJZhEvvMze6ItfkmzYBqlcoX68= Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:21:06 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mike Galbraith , Steven Rostedt , Paul Mackerras , Pekka Enberg , Gabriel Munteanu , Li Zefan , Lai Jiangshan Subject: Re: [PATCH] perfcounters: Support for ftrace event records sampling Message-ID: <20090807202105.GB4999@nowhere> References: <1249601154-5597-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1249641477.32113.664.camel@twins> <1249675747.8088.5.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1249675747.8088.5.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:09:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 12:38 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > +static void ftrace_profile_##call(proto) \ > > > +{ \ > > > + struct ftrace_data_offsets_##call __maybe_unused __data_offsets;\ > > > + struct ftrace_event_call *event_call = &event_##call; \ > > > + extern void perf_tpcounter_event(int, u64, u64, void *, int); \ > > > + struct ftrace_raw_##call *entry; \ > > > + u64 __addr = 0, __count = 1; \ > > > + unsigned long irq_flags; \ > > > + int __entry_size; \ > > > + int __data_size; \ > > > + int pc; \ > > > + \ > > > + local_save_flags(irq_flags); \ > > > + pc = preempt_count(); \ > > > + \ > > > + __data_size = ftrace_get_offsets_##call(&__data_offsets, args); \ > > > + __entry_size = __data_size + sizeof(*entry); \ > > > + \ > > > + do { \ > > > + char raw_data[__entry_size]; \ > > > + struct trace_entry *ent; \ > > > + \ > > > + entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data; \ > > > + ent = &entry->ent; \ > > > + tracing_generic_entry_update(ent, irq_flags, pc); \ > > > + ent->type = event_call->id; \ > > > + \ > > > + tstruct \ > > > + \ > > > + { assign; } \ > > > + \ > > > + perf_tpcounter_event(event_call->id, __addr, __count, entry,\ > > > + __entry_size); \ > > > + } while (0); \ > > > + \ > > > +} > > > > ok, so the one concern I have here is that the data needs to fit on the > > stack. What if someone puts a large string in the data? > > Also, how NMI safe is all that? Everything is allocated in the stack. It's NMI safe AFAICS, am I missing something?