From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932573AbZHGSfq (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:35:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932358AbZHGSfp (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:35:45 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:35985 "EHLO mail-bw0-f215.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932304AbZHGSfo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:35:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jl5rnOtAp83+oJXzB0OwY0bZNXhHTbS8gN7cbz+615m1kQcQAKo9OT83oCwM/G0Dbf ZLDvgEfQR5EQgIYcJLQdcstRSxAbemUkj7rNKbIM+JY77ei75PRyz52g7rxvhx02D+DQ oiCv6VjyfcmYftV/lRgLmOSNxOnCAjo8ijVOw= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:35:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.31-rc5-00246-g90bc1a6; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200908071927.36367.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200908071946.07991.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090807.110952.124497199.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20090807.110952.124497199.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908072035.07754.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 August 2009 20:09:52 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:46:07 +0200 > > > I've been looking and I've seen you pushing non-trivial IDE bug-fix > > patches with almost no wider hardware coverage to upstream (i.e. one > > of my own patches which has been _explicitly_ marked as needing more > > linux-next exposure).. Please note that the above incident caused unexpected/urgent work for me so I would very much prefer to avoid such things in the future.. > "When are the patches to be applied?" > > "You're a hyprocrite for applying these patches without hardware > regression testing you said is necessary." > > Ok, you're position is clear :-) Those are your own words (not mine), same goes for interpretation.. :-) > Anyways, the ide-next-2.6 tree is up on kernel.org for all to > enjoy and test, I look forward to everyone's feedback. Thanks!