From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm devices
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:21:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090808162156.GA7432@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908081026.01097.knikanth@suse.de>
On Sat, Aug 08 2009 at 12:56am -0400,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de> wrote:
> Intialize the request_queue and elevator only when the device is marked as
> a request-based device. This avoids unnecessary creation of mempool for
> requests. Also we wrongly initialize the elevator even for bio-based devices.
> As the /sys/block/dm-*/queue/scheduler is exported for device-mapper devices,
> it is possible to confuse with scheduler options for bio-based devices where
> scheduler is not at all used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
I like how this clearly splits out request-based DM queue initialization.
More comments below.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index 8a311ea..b01dfbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -2203,7 +2199,25 @@ int dm_swap_table(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *table)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - __unbind(md);
> + if (md->map)
> + __unbind(md);
> + else {
> + /* new device is being marked as either request-based or bio-based */
> + if (dm_table_request_based(table)) {
> + /* Initialize queue for request-based dm */
> + r = blk_init_allocated_queue(md->queue, dm_request_fn,
> + NULL);
> + if (r)
> + goto out;
> + md->saved_make_request_fn = md->queue->make_request_fn;
> + blk_queue_make_request(md->queue, dm_request);
This blk_queue_make_request() is redundant as it was already established
in alloc_dev(). The fact that its behavior is now altered as a result
of the md->saved_make_request_fn assignment doesn't change the fact that
the queue will be using dm_request(). Am I missing something?
Also, I think the code should be cleaned up as follows:
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index b01dfbe..1b8aa43 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -2199,25 +2199,18 @@ int dm_swap_table(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *table)
goto out;
}
- if (md->map)
- __unbind(md);
- else {
- /* new device is being marked as either request-based or bio-based */
- if (dm_table_request_based(table)) {
- /* Initialize queue for request-based dm */
- r = blk_init_allocated_queue(md->queue, dm_request_fn,
- NULL);
- if (r)
- goto out;
- md->saved_make_request_fn = md->queue->make_request_fn;
- blk_queue_make_request(md->queue, dm_request);
- blk_queue_softirq_done(md->queue, dm_softirq_done);
- blk_queue_prep_rq(md->queue, dm_prep_fn);
- blk_queue_lld_busy(md->queue, dm_lld_busy);
-
- }
+ if (!md->map && dm_table_request_based(table)) {
+ /* Initialize queue for request-based dm */
+ r = blk_init_allocated_queue(md->queue, dm_request_fn, NULL);
+ if (r)
+ goto out;
+ md->saved_make_request_fn = md->queue->make_request_fn;
+ blk_queue_softirq_done(md->queue, dm_softirq_done);
+ blk_queue_prep_rq(md->queue, dm_prep_fn);
+ blk_queue_lld_busy(md->queue, dm_lld_busy);
}
+ __unbind(md);
r = __bind(md, table, &limits);
out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-08 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-08 4:56 [PATCH 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm devices Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-08 16:21 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2009-08-10 10:21 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-10 10:48 ` [PATCH-v2 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11 8:06 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-08-11 9:05 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11 9:32 ` [PATCH-v3 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-12 2:15 ` [PATCH-v2 " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-08-12 8:47 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-14 7:01 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-11 16:23 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090808162156.GA7432@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox