From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH-v3 0/2] delay initializing queue for request-based dm
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:02:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908111502.31215.knikanth@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908101618.12508.knikanth@suse.de>
On Monday 10 August 2009 16:18:12 Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> On Saturday 08 August 2009 10:25:53 Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Currently for device-mapper devices, we initialize the mempool for
> > requests and elevator at device creation time. But only request-based
> > devices use the elevator and mempool. These patches change it to allocate
> > the mempool and initialize the elevator only for request-based devices.
> > This is done by allocating a queue at device creation time, but delaying
> > the initialization of elevator and allocation of mempool till the first
> > table load time, when the type of device would be known.
> >
> > [PATCH 1/2] Allow delaying initialization of queue after allocation
> >
> > [PATCH 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm
> > devices
> >
> > Another approach would be to free the mempool and detach elevator, if it
> > would be a bio-based device. But it is better to avoid initialization
> > itself.
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Refreshed on top of a4e7d46407d73f35d217013b363b79a8f8eafcaa
> 2. Added comments suggested by Mike Snitzer.
> 3. Cleaned up the second patch as suggested by Mike Snitzer.
>
Changes since v2:
1. Add comments suggested by Kiyoshi Ueda
2. Export symbol elv_register_queue() to modules.
3. Call elv_register_queue() after initializing the queue to use the elevator.
Thanks
Nikanth
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-08 4:55 [PATCH 0/2] delay initializing queue for request-based dm Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-10 10:48 ` [PATCH-v2 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11 9:32 ` Nikanth Karthikesan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908111502.31215.knikanth@suse.de \
--to=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox