From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: npiggin@suse.de
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>,
Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] ipc: sem optimise simple operations
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:07:11 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090811200711.GA24213@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090811111607.310739140@suse.de>
[npiggin@suse.de - Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:09:06PM +1000]
...
| +static void update_queue_simple(struct sem_array *sma, ushort semnum)
| +{
| + if (unlikely(sma->complex_count)) {
| + update_queue(sma);
| + } else {
| + struct sem *sem;
| +
| + sem = &sma->sem_base[semnum];
| + if (sem->semval > 0)
| + update_negv_queue(sma, sem);
| + if (sem->semval == 0)
| + update_zero_queue(sma, sem);
| + }
| +}
| +
...
Hi Nick,
mostly probably miss something but can't we trgigger BUG_ON at updating
zero queue if semaphore was created with undo list and via new operation
reached -ERANGE on undo value?
Again, I could be missing something or plain wrong. Just a thought.
-- Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-11 11:09 [patch 0/4] ipc sem improvements npiggin
2009-08-11 11:09 ` [patch 1/4] ipc: sem optimise undo list search npiggin
2009-08-16 13:17 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-08-11 11:09 ` [patch 2/4] ipc: sem use list operations npiggin
2009-08-16 13:18 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-08-11 11:09 ` [patch 3/4] ipc: sem preempt improve npiggin
2009-08-16 13:20 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-08-11 11:09 ` [patch 4/4] ipc: sem optimise simple operations npiggin
2009-08-11 18:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-08-11 18:23 ` Zach Brown
2009-08-12 4:07 ` Nick Piggin
2009-08-12 18:35 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-08-14 8:58 ` Nick Piggin
2009-08-14 17:53 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-08-11 20:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-08-12 4:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-08-12 5:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-08-14 18:48 ` Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090811200711.GA24213@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=Nadia.Derbey@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peifferp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox