From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751511AbZHLVfu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:35:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751287AbZHLVfu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:35:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:36558 "EHLO mail-ew0-f214.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751124AbZHLVft (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:35:49 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=wDVb2K4Uv8wytYzllyiDS0YS2I5e9pozInRL66oY0+jVhHuCImvEo3uSXUGy1gIAFn B7h+CoZAcad6qCji2p++TWLIiymML0M5pLdltw/w/pGZjnlI30oKwEcHva6vTPHV30m1 u6DdZkmRoG26W68UnQNM/zpqzyARrStARAb44= Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:35:46 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Lai Jiangshan , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Jiaying Zhang , Martin Bligh , Li Zefan , Jason Baron Subject: Re: [RFD] Kprobes/Kretprobes perf support Message-ID: <20090812213545.GC5974@nowhere> References: <1250016545-6601-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <4A82EEC5.8000603@redhat.com> <4A82F5A0.2090603@redhat.com> <20090812191305.GB5974@nowhere> <1250111397.7035.1.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1250111397.7035.1.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:09:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:13 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Ingo, Peter do you have an idea on how we could do that? > > Wouldn't it be easiest to use ftrace to create dynamic tracepoints in > the ftrace way such that they become available in > debugfs://tracing/events/kprobes/*/ and then have them interfaced the > same way as all other tracepoints? > Oh..yeah, that would be definetly simpler.