From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753811AbZHMIz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:55:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753799AbZHMIz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:55:26 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:43976 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753791AbZHMIzZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:55:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:55:05 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, galak@kernel.crashing.orga, beckyb@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] powerpc: use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h Message-ID: <20090813085505.GA10671@elte.hu> References: <1249448908-18985-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1250142522.3587.110.camel@pasglop> <20090813160625B.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090813074131.GH12143@elte.hu> <1250150981.3587.157.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1250150981.3587.157.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Ben, what's your preference? I waited for your reaction with these > > bits, i.e. they are not in tip:core/iommu yet. > > Oh I though they were... discard my previous private mail about > missing Ack's then :-) > > I'll review them more in depth hopefully tomorrow but they look > good. Sure - take your time. > > One variant would be what Fujita suggested: you could pull > > core/iommu as a basis (it's a well-tested, problem-free tree at > > the moment, with no big risky items), and then pull/apply the > > powerpc specific bits from Fujita. > > Or we can have the patches in core/iommu and I pull the whole > thing in powerpc-next. [...] Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate branch and allow a rebase, should you find any bugs during testing? Ingo