From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754553AbZHTNeI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:34:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754450AbZHTNeH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:34:07 -0400 Received: from jessica.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.47]:52047 "EHLO jessica.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754389AbZHTNeG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:34:06 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 3608 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:34:06 EDT From: Tobias Doerffel To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Atom processor inclusion Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:33:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.31-rc6; KDE/4.3.0; i686; ; ) Cc: Kelly Bowa , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20090820130648.6e7236f7@titus> <20090820105029.GF29093@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090820105029.GF29093@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3922912.Im7xykW4K4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908201433.54785.tobias.doerffel@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 3.2.5 Textanalyse (-1.4 Punkte) Fragen an/questions to: Postmaster TU Chemnitz -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Nachricht wurde nur ueber vertrauenswuerdige Rechner weitergeleitet --- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse X-Scan-Signature: 1eda448be3d4df409c597eaefe2c9e50 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart3922912.Im7xykW4K4 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 12:50:29 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > Yep, it looked acceptable - Tobias, do you have any > updates / latest version of that patch? No - it's still the improved version I posted at the end of May [1]. The=20 question is what to do with MODULE_PROC_FAMILY (CORE2 or ATOM) and the mtun= e- fallback (generic, i686, ...)? Regards, Tobias [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/374 --nextPart3922912.Im7xykW4K4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqNQq4ACgkQHsjdpw2OaacOdwCgrYKxZMSxi6ATHmau8ETKO207 RNsAnimvb5eUGFRhOE98GKdSf8MG21qL =ffhw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3922912.Im7xykW4K4--