From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751436AbZHTSgi (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:36:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751004AbZHTSgi (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:36:38 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com ([209.85.219.207]:34136 "EHLO mail-ew0-f207.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853AbZHTSgh (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:36:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ILY65eoPUskfJw7Y2svYgf007ybpUdbva7waQ3VRO6j15xc4AE8zXo9qLHElh71R5m L/k9t5wvwj5rRJNCdLsZ7uBCD7OoSErwdhChq139VU0ghf6kOgtYK9HD5kej0EmfvZii LeDwQ01gaf7k4H0aPtQIzBsZ2gpFlpRFhAaJA= Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:36:35 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: q-funk@iki.fi, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Al Viro Subject: Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue Message-ID: <20090820183635.GB8517@lenovo> References: <11fae7c70908200033k7c28561eh28e1195ce4a692f8@mail.gmail.com> <200908201704.06553.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200908201704.06553.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Rafael J. Wysocki - Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:04:06PM +0200] | On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: | > Yes, it's still valid. | | Thanks for the update. | | > Screenshots of the crash have been provided. Is anything else missing | > for the LKML to be able to debug and fix this? | | An idea of what can be wrong? | | > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: | > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report | > > of recent regressions. | > > | > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions | > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know | > > (either way). | > > | > > | > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941 | > > Subject : x86 Geode issue | > > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine | > > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old) | > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4 | | Rafael | Hi, may I post a thought? It seems strange to me that alloc_inode may set #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED; #endif [where ACL_NOT_CACHED is #define ACL_NOT_CACHED ((void *)(-1))] meanwhile say jffs2_init_acl_post use ACL_NOT_CACHED as a valid value and trying to parse it. But perhaps, I miss something. -- Cyrill