From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933000AbZHVAIE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:08:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932726AbZHVAID (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:08:03 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:36527 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755624AbZHVAIB (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:08:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:06:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Amerigo Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, andi@firstfloor.org, amwang@redhat.com, bernhard.walle@gmx.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, mingo@elte.hu, avorontsov@ru.mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [Patch 0/8] V4 Implement crashkernel=auto Message-Id: <20090821170615.1ea4a4f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090821065637.4855.32234.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090821065637.4855.32234.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (cc linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org) On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:54:12 -0400 Amerigo Wang wrote: > This series of patch implements automatically reserved memory for crashkernel, > by introducing a new boot option "crashkernel=auto". This idea is from Neil. > > In case of breaking user-space applications, it modifies this boot option after > it decides how much memory should be reserved. > > On different arch, the threshold and reserved memory size is different. Please > refer patch 8/8 which contains an update for the documentation. > > Patch 1/8 implements shrinking reserved memory at run-time, which is useful > when more than enough memory is reserved automatically. > > Note: This patchset was only tested on x86_64 with differernt memory sizes. I'd prefer that this change had been runtime tested on ia64 and powerpc and has had some quality review from relevant developers of those architectures. Looking at the cc's, I'm not sure that the powerpc guys even know about this work?