From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932443AbZHUPzK (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:55:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932265AbZHUPzJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:55:09 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:49615 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932235AbZHUPzI (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:55:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WPoA9Hiwe24/zXeKPNRxSZGqF3AGV0m0Lb4LdoCuBdYun4Jo4uvKpVvtr45sCrtQJT N4PLcQnZ3lQbH1nmqWTd5enrR9XlpBg272ofO3F4cs4bdkZwQQNImsLmyqu+9JW5lQ+H Yw2AkhSY8y9s+DMbq/MzTHML4BYt37wh9/KFM= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Mailing List Etiquette Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:54:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.31-rc6-dirty; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) Cc: David Miller , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090821081849.GA14431@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090821.015528.193723401.davem@davemloft.net> <20090821145415.GE9529@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090821145415.GE9529@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908211754.01109.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 21 August 2009 16:54:16 Theodore Tso wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 01:55:28AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux > > Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:39:53 +0100 > > > > > To me that shows you have an extremely selfish attitude. > > > > Ok Mr. "My Way Or the Highway" > > > > A lot of us are tired of your crap, and like Alan Cox I can't take you > > seriously at all. > > Seconded. At this point, I would suggest the right answer is to make I'm not sure whether seconding ad-persona attacks in Russell's direction from people who do absolutely no ARM work is the desirable way forward.. I can understand Pavel's arguments and has backed him once myself but ARM co-maintainers have voiced plausible pro-LAK arguments in the meantime.. There has been progress on the issue recently but changes like that do not happen overnight without serious (negative) impacts on the work flow and require both planning and time to do properly. Yet people continued to stress out Russell instead of giving him break.. Bart (who is a bystander but who is appalled by the way LAK-issue was handled)