From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933689AbZHWN1f (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:27:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933644AbZHWN1e (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:27:34 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:43674 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933643AbZHWN1e (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:27:34 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=cmlrLHFOnQazM5M3hGCNJteC7yB0+7JYAN0DO+illaFUUSeflXIypCS5mGF+Ppz47W JaqdLEYQNlmDfDoSajr0Yiwfq8QuP9uKPWjvUt/9WotEVvs+7nCk4cDeEFvq4p8DxMcv oT09pDY35C8iftzsxm3RkRaSHxqR/IJQFq4G4= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] Staging: rt{286,287,307}0: various fixes/cleanups Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:18:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.31-rc7-dirty; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090816192934.3789.3648.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <200908192125.59395.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1250747041.7517.33.camel@marge.simson.net> In-Reply-To: <1250747041.7517.33.camel@marge.simson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908231518.36476.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 20 August 2009 07:44:01 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 21:25 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > Thanks a lot for extra testing, could you also check what MAC version is > > this beast using? I'm now working on merging rt2870 and rt3070 together, > > and I would need somebody with 2870 flavor to verify the end result.. :) > > > > The USB dongle that I'm doing tests with is: > > > > Bus 004 Device 003: ID 148f:3070 Ralink Technology, Corp. > > > > and is identified by rt2800usb as 3070 flavor: > > > > phy0 -> rt2x00_set_chip: Info - Chipset detected - rt: 1600, rf: 0005, rev: 30700200. > > phy1 -> rt2x00_set_chip: Info - Chipset detected - rt: 1600, rf: 0003, rev: 28600101. > > This doesn't tell me whole lot, 2860 is allegedly PCI, my gizmo is USB. > (maybe i should poke it with sharp stick... nah, not bored enough) > > USB device ID is 13D3:3247, which is supported by both 2870 and 3070 > drivers, though it's associated with AzureWave instead of IMC Networks > as reported by lsusb. In the 3070 section of 2870.h however, I see... > > {USB_DEVICE(0x13D3,0x3247)}, /* AzureWave */ \ > {USB_DEVICE(0x13D3,0x3273)}, /* AzureWave 3070*/ \ > > ... so _maybe_ it's a 2870. Seems to be a case here (2870 is USB version of 2860 which would explain why MAC version is reported to be 2860)..