From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933478AbZHWSFo (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:05:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933328AbZHWSFn (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:05:43 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:36281 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933063AbZHWSFn (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:05:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:05:43 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: Tony Lindgren , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Peter Ujfalusi , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/3 v2] ARM: OMAP: DMA: Add support for DMA channel self linking on OMAP1510 Message-ID: <20090823180543.GA6167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <200908101050.02530.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> <200908231756.13016.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> <20090823170359.GA3488@sirena.org.uk> <200908231945.40187.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200908231945.40187.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> X-Cookie: Long life is in store for you. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 07:45:39PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > If I missed something and my original patch has really been applied, I'll be > happy to prepare a new version that reverts previos changes and makes those > proposed in patch v2, if those are acceptable. If none of your patches have been applied then what are the other patches that depend on this? Nobody reported any issues in testing with the other OMAP patches. I don't really mind which tree these go via but I rather suspect that ALSA will be better given all the other changes and I also suspect that you'll need to regenerate your changes against a current tree due to those changes. Tony, are you OK with that?