From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] v3 Simplify rcu_pending()/rcu_check_callbacks() API
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:42:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090824154230.GE6677@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251097816.7538.129.camel@twins>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:10:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 13:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > All calls from outside RCU are of the form:
> >
> > if (rcu_pending(cpu))
> > rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user);
> >
> > This is silly, instead we put a call to rcu_pending() in
> > rcu_check_callbacks(),
>
> It could be non-silly if rcu_pending() were a very simple inline
> function, in that case it would avoid the full function call.
>
> Still in such a case you can make rcu_check_callbacks() the inline
> function which does the same and have the real function called somthing
> else.
>
> Anyway, its all moot since rcu_pending() wasn't a simple inline function
> anyway, so you've replaced two function calls with one, which seems
> good.
Indeed, there was a time when rcu_pending() was a much simpler function,
but those days are long past. ;-)
Thank you for looking this over!!!
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 18:14 [PATCH RFC -tip 0/4] v2 RCU cleanups and simplified preemptable RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-27 18:16 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 1/4] v2 Move private definitions from include/linux/rcutree.h to kernel/rcutree.h Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-27 18:16 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 2/4] v2 Renamings to increase RCU clarity Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-27 18:16 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 3/4] v2 Consolidate sparse and lockdep declarations in include/linux/rcupdate.h Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-27 18:16 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 4/4] v2 Merge preemptable-RCU functionality into hierarchical RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-03 8:20 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 0/4] v2 RCU cleanups and simplified preemptable RCU Ingo Molnar
2009-08-03 13:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Move private definitions from include/linux/rcutree.h to kernel/rcutree.h Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:01 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Renamings to increase RCU clarity Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:01 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-24 7:17 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 " Lai Jiangshan
2009-08-24 15:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Consolidate sparse and lockdep declarations in include/linux/rcupdate.h Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:02 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 18:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-23 19:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 22:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-24 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-24 7:34 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 " Lai Jiangshan
2009-08-24 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Fix online/offline indication for rcudata.csv trace file Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:02 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Merge per-RCU-flavor initialization into pre-existing macro Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:02 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Use debugfs_remove_recursive() simplify code Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:02 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Simplify rcu_pending()/rcu_check_callbacks() API Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:02 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-24 7:10 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 " Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Merge preemptable-RCU functionality into hierarchical RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:03 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-22 20:56 ` [PATCH -tip] v3 Remove CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-23 9:03 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-08-24 7:21 ` [PATCH RFC -tip 0/4] v3 RCU cleanups and simplified preemptable RCU Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090824154230.GE6677@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox