From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753442AbZHXT6H (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:58:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753359AbZHXT6F (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:58:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com ([209.85.219.207]:57121 "EHLO mail-ew0-f207.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753353AbZHXT6E (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:58:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=SmGxGzr6hWwnWkv4ynqujhPvRKD3sw7d+ZuprS+q86REkOUARQAnpBuU/nfjcRMoe3 58XO6LQqmmY2QLnB3W///kMixuSZ6bIkJbr533kxAPrchJ+vww7Tc5PmBXvT6bNniRLQ wCRB4ghMvrU8GTywzNNzLT4NcJ1Wqyewjetiw= Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:58:01 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Josh Stone Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron , Ingo Molnar , Li Zefan , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Mathieu Desnoyers , Jiaying Zhang , Martin Bligh , Lai Jiangshan , Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tracing: Make syscall_(un)regfunc arch-specific Message-ID: <20090824195759.GA5050@nowhere> References: <1250795373-32363-1-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1250917125-6174-1-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1250917125-6174-2-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1250917125-6174-3-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <20090823211422.GG6256@nowhere> <4A92EA8E.8020400@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A92EA8E.8020400@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:31:26PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 08/23/2009 02:14 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > I really don't like that. > > See how the s390 and x86 version of the above code are completely > > identical? > > > > Please put this in kernel/ptrace.c > > Yes, I see your point, and I think kernel/ptrace.c is a fine place for > it. Making it conditional on CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS and > CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is probably best too, though I think the > latter should now be HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS. As you prefer, this new name can be indeed more verbose. Thanks. > Thanks, > > Josh