public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	christoph.thielecke@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, grant.wilson@zen.co.uk,
	mikko.cal@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] inotify: do not BUG on idr entries at inotify destruction
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:34:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908242034.50885.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090824173812.14196.381.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>

Eric Paris wrote:

> If an inotify watch is left in the idr when an fsnotify group is destroyed
> this will lead to a BUG.  This is not a dangerous situation and really
> indicates a programming bug and leak of memory.  This patch changes it to
> use a WARN and a printk rather than killing people's boxes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ static bool inotify_should_send_event(struct
> fsnotify_group *group, struct inode
> 
> static int idr_callback(int id, void *p, void *data)
> {
> +       struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry;
> +       struct inotify_inode_mark_entry *ientry;
> +
> +       entry = p;
> +       ientry = container_of(entry, struct inotify_inode_mark_entry, fsn_entry);
> + 
> +       WARN(1, "inotify closing but id=%d still in idr.  Probably leaking memory\n", id); +
> +       printk(KERN_WARNING "group=%p entry->group=%p inode=%p wd=%d\n",
> +              data, entry->group, entry->inode, ientry->wd);
>         BUG();
>         return 0;
> }

I suspect you intended to remove the BUG?

Cheers,
FJP

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-24 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-24 17:37 [PATCH 0/3] Inotify cleanup and idr race Eric Paris
2009-08-24 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] inotify: seperate new watch creation updating existing watches Eric Paris
2009-08-24 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] inotify: do not BUG on idr entries at inotify destruction Eric Paris
2009-08-24 18:34   ` Frans Pop [this message]
2009-08-24 19:09     ` Eric Paris
2009-08-24 19:23       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-24 19:32         ` Eric Paris
2009-08-24 20:36         ` Eric Paris
2009-08-25 11:42           ` Mikko C.
2009-08-25 14:18             ` Eric Paris
2009-08-25 16:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-25 17:17               ` Mikko C.
2009-08-24 17:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] inotify: fix locking around inotify watching in the idr Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200908242034.50885.elendil@planet.nl \
    --to=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christoph.thielecke@gmx.de \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=grant.wilson@zen.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-fs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikko.cal@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox