From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutilsandconsolidate linker script
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:48:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825144816.GA28026@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9412DE0200007800011A07@vpn.id2.novell.com>
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 25.08.09 16:14 >>>
> >
> >* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 25.08.09 15:56 >>>
> >> >Would it be possible to split it into two pieces: 'minimal fix' and
> >> >'clean up' portions?
> >>
> >> Besides being cumbersome, that would make it even larger, so I'd
> >> say that's not worth it.
> >
> >I mean the two patches yield the same end result. The first one
>
> I also understood it that way.
>
> >(which is smaller, hopefully) gets committed to x86/urgent, the
> >second one (the cleanups and other non-essentials) gets pushed
> >upstream in .32.
>
> The cleanup part really isn't much more than what I described with
> "Once touching this code, also use the various data section helper
> macros from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.", and if the first
> patch wouldn't use those macros, it would just grow and become
> even less readable.
fair enough. Lets hope it all goes fine.
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-18 15:51 [PATCH] x86: fix build with older binutils and consolidate linker script Jan Beulich
2009-08-21 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 6:55 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-24 7:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 7:21 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-24 16:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 22:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 8:01 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 13:53 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 13:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 14:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutils andconsolidate " Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 14:35 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutilsandconsolidate " Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 14:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090825144816.GA28026@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox