From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751228AbZH0PJW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:09:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751460AbZH0PJV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:09:21 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:40773 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbZH0PJU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:09:20 -0400 Message-Id: <20090827150051.846026837@chello.nl> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:00:51 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy , Andreas Herrmann , Balbir Singh , Peter Zijlstra Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] load-balancing and cpu_power Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi These are utterly untested patches, and even if they'd compile I guess they'll balance your system straight like a banana. But it should show the direction I'm wanting to take this thing. I'll continue prodding at this, but wanted to put this out early so we don't all start doing the same, and so that you can poke holes in it early.