From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correct cpumask on multi-node processors
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:25:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090827152551.GE13576@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251194143.7538.1128.camel@twins>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:55:43AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:31 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:36:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:46 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > > The correct mask that describes core-siblings of an processor
> > > > is topology_core_cpumask. See topology adapation patches, especially
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124964999608179
> > >
> > >
> > > argh, violence, murder kill.. this is the worst possible hack and you're
> > > extending it :/
> >
> > So this is the third code area
> > (besides sched_*_power_savings sysfs interface, and the __cpu_power fiddling)
> > that is crap, mess, a hack.
> >
> > Didn't know that I'd enter such a minefield when touching this code. ;-(
>
> Yeah, you're lucky that way ;-) Its been creaking for a while, and I've
> been making noises to the IBM people (who so far have been the main
> source of power saving patches) to clean this up, but now you trod onto
> all of it at once..
>
> > What would be your perferred solution for the
> > core_cpumask/llc_shared_map stuff? Another domain level to get rid of
> > this function?
>
> Right, I'd like to see everything exposed as domain levels.
>
>
> numa-cluster
> numa
> socket
> in-socket-numa
> multi-core
> shared-cache
> core
> threads
Out of curiosity, when does cpu_core_mask differ from llc_shared_map
on Intel? Only in case of MCM (e.g. Core2 Quad)?
If yes, the hackery of cpu_coregroup_mask() could be replace by
the domain that I'd like to introduce for Magny-Cours:
MC domain span would represent one die.
The new domain would span all dies in an MCM.
Bad idea?
Andreas
--
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Andrew Bowd, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-27 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 13:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/15] sched: Fix scheduling for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/15] x86, sched: Add config option for multi-node CPU scheduling Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-21 13:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-08-24 8:49 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/15] sched, x86: Provide initializer for MN scheduling domain, define MN level Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/15] sched: Add cpumask to be used when building MN domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/15] sched: Define per CPU variables and cpu_to_group function for " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH 5/15] sched: Add function to build MN sched domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 6/15] sched: Add support for MN domain in build_sched_groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/15] sched: Activate build of MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/15] sched: Add parameter sched_mn_power_savings to control MN domain sched policy Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:32 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-24 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 7:52 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 7:50 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 6:24 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 6:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:38 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-26 9:30 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-27 12:47 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:40 ` [PATCH 9/15] sched: Check sched_mn_power_savings when setting flags for CPU and MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:34 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-26 10:01 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched: Check for sched_mn_power_savings when doing load balancing Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:40 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-25 8:00 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched: Pass unlimited __cpu_power information to upper domain level groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-24 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:04 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:51 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:42 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched: Allow NODE domain to be parent of MC instead of CPU domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:55 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched: Detect child domain of NUMA (aka NODE) domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:13 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched: Conditionally limit __cpu_power when child sched domain has type NODE Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:19 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:46 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correct cpumask on multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:13 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-27 13:18 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 9:31 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:24 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:42 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-27 15:25 ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-08-28 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-28 12:03 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090827152551.GE13576@alberich.amd.com \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).