From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754101AbZHaTkT (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:40:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752423AbZHaTkS (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:40:18 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([88.191.76.200]:43086 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752095AbZHaTkR (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:40:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:13 +0200 From: Albin Tonnerre To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: srostedt@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: remove mentioning of legacy latency_trace file from documentation Message-ID: <20090831194013.GC4237@pc-ras4041.res.insa> References: <1251744635-14926-1-git-send-email-albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com> <20090831191937.GD6048@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090831191937.GD6048@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:19:38PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote : > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:50:35PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > # tracer: irqsoff > > @@ -382,7 +374,7 @@ The above is mostly meaningful for kernel developers. > > > > time: This differs from the trace file output. The trace file output > > includes an absolute timestamp. The timestamp used by the > > - latency_trace file is relative to the start of the trace. > > + trace file is relative to the start of the trace. > > > Not only is it wrong, but the sentence is now completely antithetic. Oops. this wasn't meant to be there. I'll fix that. Regards, -- Albin Tonnerre, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com