From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751733AbZHaLDl (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:03:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751536AbZHaLDk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:03:40 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:51926 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751244AbZHaLDj (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:03:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:35 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: i2c tree build failure Message-Id: <20090831210335.f382d7ff.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20090831120449.3f64aa74@hyperion.delvare> References: <20090831111935.5059565b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090831120449.3f64aa74@hyperion.delvare> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__31_Aug_2009_21_03_35_+1000_RcQB6i5xSyG2.A4V" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Mon__31_Aug_2009_21_03_35_+1000_RcQB6i5xSyG2.A4V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jean, On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:04:49 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: >=20 > These are caused by the fact that I moved the patch adding > class_compat_create_link() and friends out of the NEXT_PATCHES section. > I did so because Greg KH (Cc'd) added this patch to his driver-core > patch set, which I thought was part of linux-next. I simply didn't want > to apply the same patch twice. It doesn't really matter if the same patch appears twice - git usually copes quite well. Also I can tell and I (usually) don't bother commenting on it. > To clarify the dependency, I added the following to my series.conf: >=20 > # NEXT_BASE driver-core.current >=20 > but apparently it didn't work as intended. >=20 > Greg, please clarify whether the patch in question > (driver-core-add-support-for-compatibility-classes.patch) is pushed to > linux-next or not. >=20 > Stephen, if my dependency tag is not correct, please tell me how to fix > it. It was fine, except that Greg has that patch in the driver-core series (not driver-core.current). It you decide to leave that patch out and change the dependency, please let me know as I will then have to merge your tree after Greg's (it is currently earlier. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__31_Aug_2009_21_03_35_+1000_RcQB6i5xSyG2.A4V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqbrgcACgkQjjKRsyhoI8yOcQCeLEOOMNoZi91AvVn/7sU7s1Yh aMwAniC3UC5hqm3I/U2X7LNisRO/KVhN =3NL+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__31_Aug_2009_21_03_35_+1000_RcQB6i5xSyG2.A4V--