From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"linux-pm" <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10 update] PM: Measure suspend and resume times for individual devices
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:32:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908312332.26198.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908311756.54624.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Monday 31 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 31 August 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
> > > > Hm, these CPP macros are rather ugly. Why is there a need for
> > > > the TIMER_DECLARE() wrapper - if a proper inline function is
> > > > used there's no need for that.
> > >
> > > I need a variable to be declared so that I can save the "start"
> > > timestamp in it. I don't need the variable if DEBUG is unset,
> > > though.
> > >
> > > How would you do that without using a macro? Or #ifdef #endif
> > > block that would be uglier IMO (which is why I didn't do that)?
> >
> > Well, why not use an inline function like i suggested? [which does
> > nothing in the !enabled case] You can keep the local variable always
> > defined.
>
> Well, I used the macros _exactly_ because I didn't want to keep the local
> variable always defined.
>
> Now, if you think that adding several useless bytes to the stack frame is OK,
> perhaps it can be always defined. However, IMnsHO that would be
> (a) confusing (why define a variable you don't use) and (b) wasteful.
>
> Perhaps the names of the macros should be directly related to debugging?
Something like in the patch below, maybe?
Best,
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: PM: Measure suspend and resume times for individual devices
If verbose PM debugging is enabled, measure and print the time of
suspending and resuming of individual devices.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/power/swsusp.c | 2 -
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -442,11 +442,11 @@ static bool pm_op_started(struct device
*/
int pm_time_elapsed(struct timeval *start, struct timeval *stop)
{
- s64 elapsed_centisecs64;
+ s64 elapsed_msecs64;
- elapsed_centisecs64 = timeval_to_ns(stop) - timeval_to_ns(start);
- do_div(elapsed_centisecs64, NSEC_PER_SEC / 100);
- return elapsed_centisecs64;
+ elapsed_msecs64 = timeval_to_ns(stop) - timeval_to_ns(start);
+ do_div(elapsed_msecs64, NSEC_PER_SEC / 1000);
+ return elapsed_msecs64;
}
static char *pm_verb(int event)
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static char *pm_verb(int event)
static void dpm_show_time(struct timeval *start, struct timeval *stop,
pm_message_t state, const char *info)
{
- int centisecs = pm_time_elapsed(start, stop);
+ int centisecs = pm_time_elapsed(start, stop) / 10;
printk(KERN_INFO "PM: %s%s%s of devices complete in %d.%02d seconds\n",
info ? info : "", info ? " " : "", pm_verb(state.event),
@@ -497,6 +497,33 @@ static void pm_dev_err(struct device *de
kobject_name(&dev->kobj), pm_verb(state.event), info, error);
}
+#ifdef DEBUG
+static void device_show_time(struct timeval *start, struct device *dev,
+ pm_message_t state, char *info)
+{
+ struct timeval stop;
+ int msecs;
+
+ do_gettimeofday(&stop);
+ msecs = pm_time_elapsed(start, &stop);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "PID %d: %s%s%s complete in %d.%03d seconds\n",
+ task_pid_nr(current), info ? info : "", info ? " " : "",
+ pm_verb(state.event), msecs / 1000, msecs % 1000);
+}
+
+#define DEBUG_TIMEVAL(tv) struct timeval tv
+#define DEBUG_TIME_START(tv) do { \
+ do_gettimeofday(&tv); \
+ } while (0)
+#define DEBUG_TIME_SHOW(tv, dev, state, info) do { \
+ device_show_time(&tv, dev, state, info); \
+ } while (0)
+#else /* !DEBUG */
+#define DEBUG_TIMEVAL(tv)
+#define DEBUG_TIME_START(tv) do { } while (0)
+#define DEBUG_TIME_SHOW(tv, dev, state, info) do { } while (0)
+#endif /* !DEBUG */
+
/*------------------------- Resume routines -------------------------*/
/**
@@ -510,7 +537,9 @@ static void pm_dev_err(struct device *de
static int __device_resume_noirq(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
int error = 0;
+ DEBUG_TIMEVAL(start);
+ DEBUG_TIME_START(start);
TRACE_DEVICE(dev);
TRACE_RESUME(0);
@@ -523,6 +552,7 @@ static int __device_resume_noirq(struct
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
TRACE_RESUME(error);
+ DEBUG_TIME_SHOW(start, dev, state, "EARLY");
return error;
}
@@ -639,7 +669,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpm_resume_noirq);
static int __device_resume(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
int error = 0;
+ DEBUG_TIMEVAL(start);
+ DEBUG_TIME_START(start);
TRACE_DEVICE(dev);
TRACE_RESUME(0);
@@ -681,6 +713,7 @@ static int __device_resume(struct device
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
TRACE_RESUME(error);
+ DEBUG_TIME_SHOW(start, dev, state, NULL);
return error;
}
@@ -923,6 +956,9 @@ static pm_message_t resume_event(pm_mess
static int __device_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
int error = 0;
+ DEBUG_TIMEVAL(start);
+
+ DEBUG_TIME_START(start);
if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm) {
pm_dev_dbg(dev, state, "LATE ");
@@ -932,6 +968,7 @@ static int __device_suspend_noirq(struct
dev->power.op_complete = true;
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
+ DEBUG_TIME_SHOW(start, dev, state, "LATE");
return error;
}
@@ -1063,6 +1100,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpm_suspend_noirq);
static int __device_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
int error = 0;
+ DEBUG_TIMEVAL(start);
+
+ DEBUG_TIME_START(start);
down(&dev->sem);
@@ -1103,6 +1143,7 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct devic
dev->power.op_complete = true;
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
+ DEBUG_TIME_SHOW(start, dev, state, NULL);
return error;
}
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/swsusp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/swsusp.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int swsusp_swap_in_use(void)
void swsusp_show_speed(struct timeval *start, struct timeval *stop,
unsigned nr_pages, char *msg)
{
- int centisecs = pm_time_elapsed(start, stop);
+ int centisecs = pm_time_elapsed(start, stop) / 10;
int k;
int kps;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-31 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-26 20:17 [PATCH 0/6] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 20:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] PM: Introduce PM links framework Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-28 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2009-08-28 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 20:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] PM: Asynchronous resume of devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-28 15:43 ` Alan Stern
2009-08-28 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-28 19:59 ` Alan Stern
2009-08-28 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-28 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-29 2:06 ` Alan Stern
2009-08-29 12:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-29 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-30 0:53 ` Alan Stern
2009-08-30 0:48 ` Alan Stern
2009-08-30 13:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-30 21:13 ` [PATCH 10] PM: Measure suspend and resume times for individual devices (was: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PM: Asynchronous resume of devices) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-31 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-31 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-09-04 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 14:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 21:56 ` [PATCH 10 update 2x] PM: Measure suspend and resume times for individual devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-06 4:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-06 12:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 14:09 ` [PATCH 10] PM: Measure suspend and resume times for individual devices (was: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PM: Asynchronous resume of devices) Alan Stern
2009-08-31 16:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-30 6:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] PM: Asynchronous resume of devices Pavel Machek
2009-08-30 13:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 20:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] PM: Asynchronous suspend " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 20:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] PM: Allow PCI devices to suspend/resume asynchronously Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 20:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] PM: Allow ACPI " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 20:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] PM: Allow serio input " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-27 20:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-08-27 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 22:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-27 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-27 19:19 ` [PATCH 7] PM: Add a switch for disabling/enabling asynchronous suspend/resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-27 20:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-08-27 22:22 ` [PATCH 7 updated] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-28 5:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-08-28 19:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-27 19:20 ` [PATCH 8] PM: Allow user space to change the power.async_suspend flag of devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-27 20:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-08-27 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-28 7:01 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-29 19:20 ` [PATCH 8 update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-27 20:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume " Alan Stern
2009-08-27 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-29 19:22 ` [PATCH 9] PM: Measure device suspend and resume times (was: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices) Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908312332.26198.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox