From: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
To: Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
Cc: apw@canonical.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:31:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901223128.4bf1bf53@neptune.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6309cc7d77486e24aca5130ec5802dfb@coraid.com>
On Tue, 01 September 2009 Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com> wrote:
> On Sat Aug 29 09:43:54 EDT 2009, bonbons@linux-vserver.org wrote:
> ...
> > I finished bisecting the NULL object and ended up at this commit:
> > cd43e26f071524647e660706b784ebcbefbd2e44
> >
> > block: Expose stacked device queues in sysfs
> >
> > Currently stacking devices do not have a queue directory in sysfs.
> > However, many of the I/O characteristics like sector size, maximum
> > request size, etc. are queue properties.
> >
> > This patch enables the queue directory for MD/DM devices. The
> > elevator code has been modified to deal with queues that do not
> > have an I/O scheduler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> >
> >
> > This seems to generate /sys/block/$device/queue and its contents for
> > everyone who is using queues, not just for those queues that have a
> > non-NULL queue->request_fn.
>
> Thanks much for doing that. It makes sense that this change would
> have caused it to suddenly matter whether the unused queue is
> initialized.
>
> The patch looks fine to me.
Would it make sense to fine-tune the values reported by sys-fs in the
queue details so they match with the AoE device (as a separate
enhancement patch)?
Sure the queue itself won't use them, but some user-space tools might
be interested in this data.
I've not checked what information is provided by AoE protocol or can
be deducted from interface MTU.
Bruno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 16:41 [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly Andy Whitcroft
2009-08-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Andy Whitcroft
2009-08-21 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Ed Cashin
2009-08-22 9:21 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-22 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-23 9:00 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-23 20:16 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-24 14:27 ` Ed Cashin
2009-08-29 13:43 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-09-01 19:15 ` Ed Cashin
2009-09-01 20:31 ` Bruno Prémont [this message]
2009-09-02 13:31 ` Ed Cashin
2009-09-02 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-02 20:16 ` Ed Cashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090901223128.4bf1bf53@neptune.home \
--to=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=ecashin@coraid.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox