From: Raphael Manfredi <Raphael_Manfredi@pobox.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.30.5] Diagnosing an IDE lockup with SMART long tests
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:07:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090902060743.GA15101@chram.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9DF3E9.9090309@gmail.com>
Quoting Robert Hancock:
> It's most likely a bug in the IDE code somewhere, but realistically the
> most effective course of action would likely be to switch from the old IDE
> drivers and use libata instead. The IDE code doesn't receive that much
> testing these days, and it's really hard to debug (as you've seen, the
> debugging output is rather atrocious).
Sure, but we're talking a production machine here. Moving to libata to
handle the IDE drives would involve many changes everywhere in the system
and cause instability. For instance, /etc/fstab would need to refer to
/dev/sd*, /etc/mdadm.conf needs rewriting as well... This is a complex move,
and there's no assurance that libata won't have bugs in its PATA handling.
Since the machine is otherwise stable, I'm rather aiming at a workaround.
Today, the workaround I have is to not run SMART long tests but it proved
dangerous. Therefore, I'm looking for a kernel workaround to avoid the
lockups.
Why would the reading of the status register of the IDE interface cause a
lockup? If I can prevent the lockup and resume work, I would not mind having
a few lost interrupts events now and then.
Raphael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-02 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-01 16:27 [2.6.30.5] Diagnosing an IDE lockup with SMART long tests Raphael Manfredi
2009-09-02 4:26 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-02 6:07 ` Raphael Manfredi [this message]
2009-09-02 11:19 ` Raphael Manfredi
2009-09-02 11:51 ` Ondrej Zary
2009-09-02 11:59 ` Raphael Manfredi
2009-09-02 14:42 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-02 14:52 ` Raphael Manfredi
2009-09-03 0:24 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-04 5:35 ` Raphael Manfredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090902060743.GA15101@chram.org \
--to=raphael_manfredi@pobox.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox