From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753422AbZIBJTU (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 05:19:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752777AbZIBJTT (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 05:19:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37061 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752717AbZIBJTS (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 05:19:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:13:40 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Ingo Molnar , arjan@infradead.org, jeremy@goop.org, mschmidt@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] kthreads: simplify !kthreadd_task logic, kill kthreadd_task_init_done Message-ID: <20090902091340.GA5173@redhat.com> References: <20090901100351.GA3361@elte.hu> <20090901113914.GA23578@elte.hu> <20090901130436.GA22514@redhat.com> <20090901131440.GA29783@elte.hu> <20090901133709.GA24041@redhat.com> <20090901135925.GA9083@elte.hu> <20090901145526.GA31317@redhat.com> <20090901165235.GA9105@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/01, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov writes: > > > On 09/01, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> > >> On 09/01, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > > >> > * Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> > > >> > > On 09/01, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > * Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Yes, this should work. But I _think_ we can make the better fix... > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I'll try to make the patch soon. Afaics we don't need > >> > > > > kthreadd_task_init_done. > >> > > > > >> > > > ok. > >> > > > >> > > Just in case, the patch is ready. [...] > >> > > >> > yes - that's roughly the cleanup i referred to in the commit log. > >> > > >> > way too late for -rc8 though - the minimal fix i did _might_ be > >> > eligible. > >> > > >> > agreed? > >> > >> Agreed. Then I will sent the patch on top of this change. > > > > OK, I am sending the patch on top of your fix. Not sure how to really > > test it, but at least the kernel works when I apply the debugging patch > > below on top. > > Stupid question. How is it that we wind up trying to start kernel threads > before it is safe to do so? > > Races should be impossible because the scheduler isn't running until a few > lines later. Yes, I am confused too. At first I thought I understand the race, now I don't. Please see the whole thread: http://marc.info/?t=125180592500005 Oleg.