public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:47:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090902111759.GB3817@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901083825.985050292@chello.nl>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:34:34AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In order to prepare for a more dynamic cpu_power, update the group sum
> while walking the sched domains during load-balance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  kernel/sched.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -3699,6 +3699,28 @@ static inline int check_power_save_busie
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> 
> +static void update_sched_power(struct sched_domain *sd)
> +{
> +	struct sched_domain *child = sd->child;
> +	struct sched_group *group, *sdg = sd->groups;
> +	unsigned long power = sdg->__cpu_power;
> +
> +	if (!child) {
> +		/* compute cpu power for this cpu */
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	sdg->__cpu_power = 0;
> +
> +	group = child->groups;
> +	do {
> +		sdg->__cpu_power += group->__cpu_power;
> +		group = group->next;
> +	} while (group != child->groups);
> +
> +	if (power != sdg->__cpu_power)
> +		sdg->reciprocal_cpu_power = reciprocal_value(sdg->__cpu_power);
> +}
> 
>  /**
>   * update_sg_lb_stats - Update sched_group's statistics for load balancing.
> @@ -3712,7 +3734,8 @@ static inline int check_power_save_busie
>   * @balance: Should we balance.
>   * @sgs: variable to hold the statistics for this group.
>   */
> -static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_group *group, int this_cpu,
> +static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
> +			struct sched_group *group, int this_cpu,
>  			enum cpu_idle_type idle, int load_idx, int *sd_idle,
>  			int local_group, const struct cpumask *cpus,
>  			int *balance, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
> @@ -3723,8 +3746,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
>  	unsigned long sum_avg_load_per_task;
>  	unsigned long avg_load_per_task;
> 
> -	if (local_group)
> +	if (local_group) {
>  		balance_cpu = group_first_cpu(group);
> +		if (balance_cpu == this_cpu)
> +			update_sched_power(sd);
> +	}

I guess the intention of this check is to ensure that the cpu_power for
the group of sd is updated only by a specific member of the group and
that would ideally be the first member of the group.

Thus, this check has more to do with this_cpu being the
group_first_cpu() than this_cpu being the balance_cpu. Correct ?

> 
>  	/* Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group */
>  	sum_avg_load_per_task = avg_load_per_task = 0;
> @@ -3828,7 +3854,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(st
>  		local_group = cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu,
>  					       sched_group_cpus(group));
>  		memset(&sgs, 0, sizeof(sgs));
> -		update_sg_lb_stats(group, this_cpu, idle, load_idx, sd_idle,
> +		update_sg_lb_stats(sd, group, this_cpu, idle, load_idx, sd_idle,
>  				local_group, cpus, balance, &sgs);
> 
>  		if (local_group && balance && !(*balance))
> @@ -3863,7 +3889,6 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(st
>  		update_sd_power_savings_stats(group, sds, local_group, &sgs);
>  		group = group->next;
>  	} while (group != sd->groups);
> -
>  }
> 
>  /**
> 
> -- 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-02 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-01  8:34 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] load-balancing and cpu_power -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:54   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Restore " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Add SD_PREFER_SIBLING tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:17   ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-09-02 11:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Update " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] sched: add smt_gain Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:22   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-02 11:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Add smt_gain tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:24   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Implement " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:56   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Scale " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:29   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-04  8:56   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Try " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 12:12   ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-09-04  8:56   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 10:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] load-balancing and cpu_power -v2 Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-03 12:10 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-09-03 13:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  7:19   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04  9:27     ` [crash] " Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 10:25       ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Fix dynamic power-balancing crash tip-bot for Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090902111759.GB3817@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox