From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/8] sched: add smt_gain
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:52:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090902112250.GD3817@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901083826.073345955@chello.nl>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:34:35AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The idea is that multi-threading a core yields more work capacity than
> a single thread, provide a way to express a static gain for threads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
> include/linux/topology.h | 1 +
> kernel/sched.c | 8 +++++++-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
> unsigned int newidle_idx;
> unsigned int wake_idx;
> unsigned int forkexec_idx;
> + unsigned int smt_gain;
> int flags; /* See SD_* */
> enum sched_domain_level level;
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
> | SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER, \
> .last_balance = jiffies, \
> .balance_interval = 1, \
> + .smt_gain = 1178, /* 15% */ \
/* 15% of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE */ , I suppose.
> }
> #endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -8490,9 +8490,15 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int
> weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
> /*
> * SMT siblings share the power of a single core.
> + * Usually multiple threads get a better yield out of
> + * that one core than a single thread would have,
> + * reflect that in sd->smt_gain.
> */
> - if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1)
> + if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1) {
> + power *= sd->smt_gain;
> power /= weight;
> + power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
> + }
> sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, power);
> return;
> }
>
> --
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-02 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-01 8:34 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] load-balancing and cpu_power -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 8:54 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Restore " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 8:55 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Add SD_PREFER_SIBLING tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:17 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-02 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 8:55 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Update " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] sched: add smt_gain Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-09-02 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 8:55 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Add smt_gain tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:24 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-04 8:55 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Implement " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 8:56 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Scale " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:29 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-04 8:56 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Try " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01 8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 12:12 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-09-04 8:56 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 10:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] load-balancing and cpu_power -v2 Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-03 12:10 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-09-03 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 9:27 ` [crash] " Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 10:25 ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Fix dynamic power-balancing crash tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090902112250.GD3817@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox