public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/8] sched: add smt_gain
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:52:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090902112250.GD3817@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901083826.073345955@chello.nl>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:34:35AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The idea is that multi-threading a core yields more work capacity than
> a single thread, provide a way to express a static gain for threads.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h    |    1 +
>  include/linux/topology.h |    1 +
>  kernel/sched.c           |    8 +++++++-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
>  	unsigned int newidle_idx;
>  	unsigned int wake_idx;
>  	unsigned int forkexec_idx;
> +	unsigned int smt_gain;
>  	int flags;			/* See SD_* */
>  	enum sched_domain_level level;
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
>  				| SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER,	\
>  	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
>  	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
> +	.smt_gain		= 1178,	/* 15% */	\

/* 15% of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE */ , I suppose.

>  }
>  #endif
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -8490,9 +8490,15 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int 
>  		weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
>  		/*
>  		 * SMT siblings share the power of a single core.
> +		 * Usually multiple threads get a better yield out of
> +		 * that one core than a single thread would have,
> +		 * reflect that in sd->smt_gain.
>  		 */
> -		if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1)
> +		if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1) {
> +			power *= sd->smt_gain;
>  			power /= weight;
> +			power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
> +		}
>  		sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, power);
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> -- 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-02 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-01  8:34 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] load-balancing and cpu_power -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:54   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Restore " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Add SD_PREFER_SIBLING tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:17   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-02 11:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Update " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] sched: add smt_gain Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:22   ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-09-02 11:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Add smt_gain tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:24   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-04  8:55   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Implement " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  8:56   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Scale " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 11:29   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-04  8:56   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Try " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-01  8:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 12:12   ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-09-04  8:56   ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-02 10:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] load-balancing and cpu_power -v2 Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-03 12:10 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-09-03 13:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  7:19   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04  9:27     ` [crash] " Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 10:25       ` [tip:sched/balancing] sched: Fix dynamic power-balancing crash tip-bot for Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090902112250.GD3817@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox