From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:21:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903132212.132929742@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090903132145.482814810@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2319 bytes --]
cpu_power is supposed to be a representation of the process capacity
of the cpu, not a value to randomly tweak in order to affect
placement.
Remove the placement hacks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
include/linux/topology.h | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8468,15 +8468,13 @@ static void free_sched_groups(const stru
* there are asymmetries in the topology. If there are asymmetries, group
* having more cpu_power will pickup more load compared to the group having
* less cpu_power.
- *
- * cpu_power will be a multiple of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE. This multiple represents
- * the maximum number of tasks a group can handle in the presence of other idle
- * or lightly loaded groups in the same sched domain.
*/
static void init_sched_groups_power(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
struct sched_domain *child;
struct sched_group *group;
+ long power;
+ int weight;
WARN_ON(!sd || !sd->groups);
@@ -8487,22 +8485,20 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int
sd->groups->__cpu_power = 0;
- /*
- * For perf policy, if the groups in child domain share resources
- * (for example cores sharing some portions of the cache hierarchy
- * or SMT), then set this domain groups cpu_power such that each group
- * can handle only one task, when there are other idle groups in the
- * same sched domain.
- */
- if (!child || (!(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) &&
- (child->flags &
- (SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)))) {
- sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
+ if (!child) {
+ power = SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
+ /*
+ * SMT siblings share the power of a single core.
+ */
+ if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1)
+ power /= weight;
+ sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, power);
return;
}
/*
- * add cpu_power of each child group to this groups cpu_power
+ * Add cpu_power of each child group to this groups cpu_power.
*/
group = child->groups;
do {
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 13:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] load-balancing and cpu_power -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched: add smt_gain Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] x86: generic aperf/mperf code Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:19 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:34 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 14:22 ` Dave Jones
2009-09-04 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 17:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched: provide arch_scale_freq_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903132212.132929742@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox